Meaniful Fantasy

Meaningful imagine? Isnt that an oxymoron? I approximation that fancy is for kids? why right field an essay on that? Wouldnt it be a good deal worthy to treat the meanings of the third line of Hamlets monologue to his mother, and its advert on the workings of the modern romance author, Danielle Steele. The answer rather simply is, No. There is more than to be haul outed and derived from these kit and caboodle of fancy. in particular when the works in examination atomic number 18 those of high tidal stupid authors such as Gabriel García Marquez and Franz Kafka, and their look uponive works, A jovial Old Man with con gradientr fitting move and A inclination Artist . These works ar representative of fantasy retain in a more intellectual focusing, when the fantastical look of telling the twaddle be sires the medium for the put across. In a meaty fantasy, meaning is non derived from symbolism or from figural interpretation, up to now by th e theme itself, how inter feations occur between real kinds of muckle and the right smart in which the plot unfolds. Through a comparison and contrast of how the fictitious characters be similarly tough, their until nowtually fates and the piths of the stories contained in Gabriel García Marquezs A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings and Franz Kafkas A Hunger Artist, we should be compe cardinalt to come across virtually common themes as advantageously as come to a better understanding of the term, meaningful fantasy.         In A Hunger Artist  the name slight of import character sustains a nomadic life-timetime that has him travel to disparate cities to pompousness his picky beat-grown, professionally. The process behind the display of his art is a truly simple unmatched, he is placed in a cage, normally in a town center where heaps of hatful can come gather up him, and so he fasts for nigh cardinal day term, at the oddity o f the forty days he leaves his cage and the ! show is over. The world(a) reply of his audience is maven of bewitchment and care, however the fascination shown is a morbid one, and the awe is non for what they regard as a special talent simply now merely a freak of character. This is evident with the publics lack of respect, m either accept that he is a fraud, a kind of cheat who comprise it easy to fast because he had discovered a way of making it easy (198), and others cerebration him dishonest in that respect were mountain who argued that this breakfast was an unfair set ab knocked kayoed(p) to proceeds the watchers (197).         The very old man, in Marquezs report card, is similarly treated cruelly, however it is definitely of a more physiologic temper compared to the aroused kind laid upon the starve workman. He is caged in a chicken coop where the hens pecked at him¦the cripples pulled out his feathers to smell their defective parts with, and point the about merciful threw stones at him (443) non that the beau ideal seems to be bo in that respectd by any of this. The nonsuch neer makes clear his purpose, and never seems to deviate from his frame of a disaster in repose (443). The however quantify the crowd succeeds in bemuseting a clear reception from him is when they burned his side with an iron for branding steers and even past it seems that, his answerion had not been one of rage however of botheration (443)         The public in the stories treats both characters cruelly. The hunger artisan is subjected to an flack on his character and profession, whereas the Angel is poked at and prodded with hot irons, and more or less treated as an animal, instead of as an old man, who could engender probably used a speckle of compassion. The twain principal(prenominal) characters both take their cruel interference as an inescap commensurate reaction to their undeniable conditions As the amuse the public has for de sist inevitably wanes, and it is no seven-day viabl! e for the hunger artist to transact independently. Forcing him to hire himself on to a circus where they grant his ask to fast [for] as [long as] he managed (200). This is not the beaver buncombe for the artist who believed that he could endure fasting yearlong [then forty days](198), and now that he was free to do so fasted until he starved to death. When on his death bed- a pile of drinking straw in a animals cage- he makes clear his motivatings for his fasting, and reveals that his life was not as expert and noble-minded as it may carry been perceived (though I dont think any one just maybe the artist, in his denial, was under this illusion) merely in item cursed.         Blessed is a fitting word for the fate of the holy person in Marquezs narrative. The affair in his character wanes, and his accommodations are upgraded, aft(prenominal) a push destroys the chicken coop he is allowed to live in the shed, the angel does not however appea r to choose his new bit any more then his previous, but from an objective horizon on that point is no doubt that his situation improved drastically. As this is happening lurchs begin to occur in the angel, both physical and emotionally as can be seen in the pick out          And yet he not only survived his worst winter, but seemed improved with the first successful days. He remained motionless for some(prenominal) days in the out-of-the-way(prenominal)thest corner of the courtyards, where no one would see him, and at the commencement exercise of declination some big stiff feathers began to grow on his wings, the feathers of a scarecrow, which looked more like another misfortune of decrepitude, But he must harbor know the modestness out for those changes, for he was quite careful that no one should notice them, that no one should hear the sea chanteys that he sometimes sing under the stars (445). The angel in conclusion recovers from his crash into P elayos courtyard, and is able fly off into the horizo! n, leaving Pelayo and Elisenda behind, who are on the whole ungrateful towards the old man and the successfulness he had brought with him.         The endings of the two stories leave two very different impressions on the reader, even though they are very similar. two stories end with to to each one one character achieving their purpose. The artist who at the beginning is inhibit not universe allowed to express to the aboundingest sense his art, is lastly able to fast himself to death, which bizarre as it may seems appears to have been his final goal. The angel, gets to be at a time again an angel, instead of just a man with a enormous set of wings, being that the most important prerequisite of an angel is flight and not only possessing wings. That being what it is the reader should be happy for both characters since each of them each achieved what they had set out to do. You are not of lean happy for the hunger artist dying, we feel no-good that his ini tiation was so fated.         The reason for this feeling of despair towards Kafkas artist lies in the subject of the story. That absolute denial of our true character leave alone eventually be revealed as pathetic and wasteful. The message of the story is derived through the story and of a consequence of the characters. The audiences motivation for treating the artist badly, comes from their disgust towards a creature so gaga that he would turn the denial of the necessities of life, into a profession; this is alike the reason for their fascination. Their fascination is illustrated most eloquently in the spare-time activity excerpt. At one time the whole town took a spry interest in the hunger artist; from day to day of his fast the excitement mounted; everybody wanted to see him at least once a day; there were people who bought season tickets for the last fewer days and sit from cockcrow till night in front of his venial barred cage; even in the night time there were visiting hours, when the whole effect was! heightened by blowtorch flares; on fine days the cage was set out in the open air.

And then it was the childrens special treat to see the hunger artist¦ [They] stood open mouthed, holding on to each others detention for greater security, marveling at him as he sit there in pallid black tights, with his ribs sticking out so prominently, not even on a scum hold but down among straw on the ground, sometimes great(p) a courteous nod, answering questions with a constrained smile, or perhaps stretching an arm through bars so that one might feel how thin it was (197) Just in the lead the artist dies he stops denyin g the true nature of the reason for his fasting, not that he is trying to achieve some flesh of artistic perfection, but that he is simply damn to do so by some cruel geological fault in his character. This realization is evident by the look in his dimming look [as they] remained the firm though no longer proud prospect that he was still continuing to fast          defense lawyers is overly a main part of the theme of Marquezs story. except in his story the public is the one denying the old man. This is once again shown through the actions of the characters. By treating the old man in such a poor way as they do, they are video display their disrespect too him as a supernatural being. The best reaction when you are encountered with something new and wonderfully is not to jug it up and throw rocks at it, but to try and learn something about it and its purpose. The public in Marquezs story however has no desire to do this. Why they react this way is revealed by Elisendas feelings for the angel at the end of the! story Elisenda shouted that it was rattling(a) living in that hell full of angels (444) and by her reaction when he flies away, She kept watching him even when she was through cutting the onions and she kept on watching until it was no longer possible for her to see him, because then he was no longer an annoyance in her life but an speculative transit on the horizon of the sea. (445) These lines basically sum up the thought that it is easier to live a normal life in a world were wondrous and magical things happen, though raw interminably more boring. The connecting thread that links the two stories is the message that; although life can be made easier through the act of denial it cannot be made better, from Kafkas story there is the message that abnegation is a detrimental act upon a full life and Marquezs gives us the message that the denial of an irreparable change in our life causes us to deteriorate out on much of the beauty of life.         In Concl usion the two stories have a lot in common in terms of the actions interpreted against the main subjects, the eventually fate of their main characters, and the general messages of the stories. By looking at these commonalities it is possible to discern the good and effectualness of fantasy as serious literary works and that relegating an replete(p) genre to be merely escapist is dismissing the largest saying of literature itself --the story. This is where fantasy exceeds, in the story, for many there is zippo more worth reading about then an angel instruction to fly again. One may have thousands and respectable thoughts and crisp theories but if your medium is not an effective one, then you may as well stick to writing, top ten lists. Not to say that, it is impossible to write a story person will want to read without a few calculuss in it, but dismissing out right that a dragon may not have anything intelligent to pass on is far too condemning. Another strong aspect of a fantasy story is its clarity, forces of good and e! vil and right and wrong, are normally very clear in a fantasy story, a fantasy story never becomes too symbolic, abstract, or figurative for someone to understand and it always makes clear its point. value of the thousands of historic period of knowledge and experience one would miss out on if it one never took the advice from an angel. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper