Binge Drinking Among College Students

Joel Castaneda August 3, 2011 HSC 421 Prof. Garrido fizzle alcohol addiction Among College Students With extreme evaluate of thrust presenting among new adults, college students continue to be a immemorial focus for a range of alcohol prevention efforts. The rates of scarf out insobriety among college students is nearly double the rates for high school students, which may indicate that the college environment encourages high risk swallow. some(prenominal) students view strained tipsiness as a rite of passage that everyone must go through in life and be looked at as beingness cool. Young adults aged 18-22 enrolled full-time in a college were much ap advance than their friction matchs not enrolled full time to physical exertion alcohol, drink heavily, and binge drink (Cremeens, 1). Half of these binge drinkers who binge drink do so much(prenominal) than once a week. Binge beverage on college camp spends has vex a recognized activity to do being influences from ei ther other college students or friends, followed by harmful effects on a students body even resulting death. Binge drinking results from a students submission to peer pressure, the want of remote control over the student, and the denial that drinking leads to staring(a) consequences.Binge drinking is defined as five or more drinks in a row for men and four or more drinks in a row for women in about two hours. Many students participate in binge drinking to be heartyly authentic into a group, but other students find it difficult to deliver the plectrum to be the sober. Many binge drinkers realize that there is little ready outside influence to push them away from the alcohol and they abuse their freedom (Norman, 2011). Most binge drinkers do not consider themselves to be puzzle drinkers which adds to the difficulty in solving this college epidemic.They associate binge drinking with a good time, but many ar blind to the harm it causes, such as failing grades and un plan c ozy encounters which may lead to sexually transmitted diseases or unplanned pregnancies. Binge drinking has extend an current part of the college experience for many students. Although there are other reasons a student may assume to binge drink, the influence of friends, the lack of outside control and the denial of drinking-related problems are the main forces driving the need to refine alcohol to the point of physical harm.The extreme denial that the alcohol stool cause severe problems lies at the root of the college binge drinking crisis. at once students book an established binge drinking habit, they do not compliments to believe that something that benefactors them forget their responsibilities could be harmful. In many situations, binge drinking goes undetected because people believe if their friends are engaging in the uniform drinking habits, they must be acceptable. Women who regularly compare their drinking to mens drinking are more likely to underestimate the s everity of their drinking.When young person girls start drinking at such an early age, their brain starts exploitation and it interferes with their brain activation. This jakes become a problem because it aptitude get down negative impacts on concentration and back tooth cause problems when driving, dramatic playing sports involving colonial moves, using a map or re componenting how to get somewhere. Since this has become such a problem on college campuses, many universities have employ a variety of programs as a means to undertake sullen drinking to try and conquer the misperceptions of college drinking of students.The theory of Planned doings is utilized as a textile for predicting binge drinking among young college students. According to the TPB, the cause of this look is due to the individualists tendency to engage in the sort which is determined by three constructs. First, is the individuals attitude towards the behavior. Second is the individuals perception o f the social pressure from important others to perform or not perform the behavior. troika is the individuals perception of the ease or difficulty of performing the behavior, which is seen to cover the influence of both internal and external control factors (Norman, P. Conner, M. , 26). Constructs that make up the Theory of Planned conduct are attitude toward the behavior, inborn norms, perceived behavioral control, intention, and behavior. The Health Belied Model is another theoretical world for researching binge drinking. This seat is a value-expectancy theory, meaning everyone has the desire to avoid an illness or get well and the belief that a specific behavior will prevent the illness from occurring.In relation to this study, a advert wants their child to avoid lumbering drinking during their college years, and the belief that a parent has some influence on their child behavior to prevent heavy drinking (Cremeens, 3). Constructs that make up the Health judgment Model ar e perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and cues to action. As a model of health behavior, the Transtheoretical Model potentially offers a mechanism to identify and answer for processes that are purported to motivate, prepare and assist individuals in realizing behavior castrate.This model has in any case had a significant impact on the way the substance use disorders are understood and treated. It has also examined the extent to which the TTM stage paradigm offers an liable(p) description of individuals with substance use problems, and their readiness to change their substance use problems, and their readiness to change their substance user behavior (Migneault, Adams, Read, 438). Constructs that make up the Transtheoretical Model are pre contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, maintenance, and termination.Using the Transtheoretical Model, heavy drinkers might be asked if they are planning to reduce their drinking to a s maller amount at heart the next six months. Based on their responses they would be assigned to precontemplation, contemplation or preparation stages to see if they do have intent to change their behavior. This model is usually used for behaviors that can be changed in the big run and not immediately. In the other hand the Health Belief Model and Theory of Planned Behavior is used for shorter amount of time. on with, the Health belief Model is used as a framework to explore parent-child communication patterns among first-year college students as a mean of cut down heavy drinking (Cremeens, 4). Parents try to talk to their children and let them know what they might expect in college and be aware of the dangers behind it. For example, reminding them of a family member or a good friend of their dying in a car accident due to drunk driving. This will usually help students realize that driving while under the influence is not a fun thing to do.Compared to the other two models, the Theo ry of Planned Behavior is the only one that deals with the individuals intention to engage in the behavior. Using the other two, someone else has to influence a person to level drinking. The individuals attitude is important, they know that drinking is bad for them so they want to stop drinking and stay sober or at least not drink as much. All three of the models have to do with the attitude being the strongest predictor of binge drinking intentions by not caring about what harm they can cause to their bodies when they drink.Lastly, models and theories plow that excessive drinking for a long period of time, causes higher levels of temptation to drink and decline levels of confidence to stop drinking. Binge drinking is ordinary and dangerous but is not a well-organized public health program. there are some recommendations that can be done to try and lower the number the number of young adults that perform this behavior. The U. S. Government can evoke programs and policies that work to prevent binge drinking. They can also provide states and communities with development and tools to put into practice prevention strategies that work.Along with, they can evaluate programs and constitution effectiveness that are already in place and track trends in binge drinking. States can review interventions that are known to work to reduce binge drinking adopted by local leaders. The state can also reduce alcohol marketing to the youth. Most importantly, they can flummox partnerships between schools, community organizations, law enforcement, and public health agencies to reduce binge drinking. Furthermore, doctors, nurses, and other providers can choose not to binge drink themselves. They can screen patients for binge drinking and use behavioral counseling to reduce problem drinking.Lastly, they can support community efforts to reduce binge drinking by passing out flyers explaining the dangers and results of drinking. All people can choose not to binge drink themselve s and help others not to do it. not drinking and driving and if you plan on drinking take a sober designated driver. Choose not to drink if they teens, pregnant, or may become pregnant. Talking with a health care provider about their drinking behavior and requesting counseling if they drink too much can be recommended. Lastly, people can participate in community efforts to prevent venial and binge drinking (CDC, 2010).Deciding what role alcohol will play is a choice that every student must make. Having friends who drink, a lack of control from outside sources and the denial of the consequences of binging are not excuses for drinking excessively. beverage with friends can seem more tempting than studying, feeling stressed out, blase or lonely, but as many students find out, the consequences are not worth the short-term relief. In reality, the emotional regret of an unplanned sexual encounter or failing grades outweighs any temporary negative feelings.Drinking as a result of any of these causes demonstrates a weakness in character and the inability to make educated decisions. References Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, (2010). Binge drinking what can be done? Atlanta, GA Retrieved from http//www. cdc. gov/vitalsigns/BingeDrinking/WhatCanBeDone. html Cremeens, J. L. , Usdan, S. L. , Brock-Martin, A. , Martin, R. J. , & Watkins, K. (2008). PARENT-CHILD communion TO REDUCE HEAVY ALCOHOL USE AMONG FIRST-YEAR COLLEGE STUDENTS. College Student Journal, 42(1), 152-163. Migneault, J. P. , Adams, T. B. , & Read, J. P. (2005). practise of the transtheoretical model to substance abuse historical development and future directions. dose and Alcohol Review, doi 10. 1080/09595230500290866 Norman, P. (2011). The theory of planned behavior and binge drinking among undergraduate students Assessing the impact of habit strength. Addictive Behaviors, 36(5), 502-507. doi10. 1016/j. addbeh. 2011. 01. 025 Norman, P. , & Conner, M. (2006). The theory of planned behavior and binge drinking assesing the moderating role of past behavior withing the theory of planned behavior. British Journal of Health Psychology, (11), doi 10. 1348/135910705X43741