Thursday, April 25, 2019
Product Liability Case Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words
Product financial obligation Case - Research Paper ExampleHowever, she was subsequently diagnosed shoulder chondrolysis that caused her shoulder socket and ball to fuse, severely c move back shoulder motion. As a result, she filed a product liability suit against I-Flow Corp, which manufactured the PainBuster device. In this case, she insist that the device had not received FDA approval for use in such cases, arguing the products manufacturer was liable for the sale of this product despite not giving adequate warning and was, therefore, unreasonably dangerous (Moylan, 2015). There is no mention of the insurance company in the article, which might be explained by the fact the case was initially thrown out and the insurance company was not needed.The Courts of Appeals for the Ninth round found that, for medical devices, negligence of memoriseion was grounds for product liability, stating that this finding was not in contravention of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 or the u nderlying intent of the US Congress in making these amendments to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics process (Moylan, 2015). The suspected reason for Christinas disorder was a pain pump that her doctors used to directly deal painkillers to her shoulder joint following the surgical procedure. Normally, this device is used to deliver different types of pain medications to the surgical process site quickly and directly. However, the procedure involved in using the device has been linked to development of chondrolysis, which is a debilitating condition of the joints. This disorder causes the depletion of cartilage that separates and connects bones and, as a result, the joints become fused and lose all mobility. In majority of cases, the discovery and diagnosis of this condition happens too late for any impelling treatment or cure (Moylan, 2015).Before submitting her product liability case to court, Christina requested the court to instruct the jury on the negligence theory per se.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment