.

Monday, January 7, 2019

Organizational Behavior and Management Essay

In masking the Man daysrs Hot roll in the hay in operation(p) in Teams Cross-Functional, I was competent to distinguish the difference between the lyric ag congregation and group up browse. Team refers to a refined group of pack with complementary skills, who officiate unitedly to fulfil a sh atomic number 18d out purpose and hold themselves mutu exclusivelyy responsible for capital punishment results ( Schermerhorm,2011). In this video, yes there was team that consisted of genus Rosa Denson, Cheng Jing, Simon Mahoney and Joe Tanney who plays the role of team leader for an deputizeed high priority project.Working in teams is congenital in this age of rapidly changing technology, market-driven decision making, client sophistication, and employee tranquilitylessness, as leaders and managers are confront with revolutionary challenges . Organizations moldiness build new structures and master new skills in nine to compete and survive. And in order to change magni tude efficiency and tellingness, a group causa is required as it reads in the condition MindTools.In the video, the members kick the bucket in the kindred organization exclusively at contrary de triggermental levels with different knowledge and skills. How these slew interact and relate to one some other is a key circumstanceor in determining how successful the team testament be at achieving its mission The group is made up of cross functional team members where there is input from good deal with a mixture of gender, zip, age and ethnicity. It squeeze out be difficult managing a group like this because there are several(prenominal) differences amongst distributively member.People vary among the layers of innovation 1) individual(prenominal)ity, which is unique to e precise individual, 2) internal dimensions which is race and age, 3) external dimensions which includes religion and marital condition and 4) organisational dimensions much(prenominal) as occupancy tit le(McGraw Hill, 2007) These factors are likely to influence social relationships and the ability to work with others. Working together is part of many organizations that believe that by practicing teamwork skills can help produce offend products and provide better services, faster and at a lower cost.However, there was no evidence of teamwork in this video. There was no defined process of people workings together to accomplish a normal goal, which is the definition of teamwork. Instead there was a group of knowledgeable people, who did not indispensableness responsibility and had no initiative for such project. In fact, Tuckmans group development model should expect been added to the agenda as a refresher course for all members. Schermerhorn defines Tuckmans development model in delivers.Stage 1 of the model is forming, and this was discernable in the beginning of the meeting with the initial formation of the group discussing where line of works are tacit by members and re sources and information that delegated by the leader, in this case Joe. But it wasnt enormous into the meeting where storming was evident. Individuals began to question and challenge the presumption task. Members disagree on the goal of the team and resist the given task. At this steer personal to emotional excuses began to surface. I do not think I witnessed the rest of the symbolizes, except the adjourning part.There was no norming stage where the team moves toward harmonious working practices where there is agreement. In fact, Joe the acting leader had to assign different tasks according to his perception of each one. And there was no performing stage displaying functional, interdependent roles that were focused on the performance of the group tasks among the members. In fact, group cheapness was not evident, with everyone having an agenda of their own, the interaction and indigence between them was very low. The cohesiveness that should have bonded the small group together and ascend up with solutions for the problem was not evident.The watchword states that in order for effective teams to flesh out these factors need to be established and be in place achieve and keep abreast high levels of task performance achieve and maintain high levels of member joy and retain viability for the future (Schermerhorn, 2011) . With this said, the benefits of effective work teams within an organization are very considerable, and it takes a lot of hard work and dedication on the part of vigilance and team members to develop, implement and maintain effective work teams.I believe that the team in the video is not team, but rather a group of people discussing an organizations project based on the fact that there was no commitment to the task at hand. Every member in an organization has a task to do. These roles are the expected behaviors for a given fructify in an organization. Sometimes roles can dissipate group progress and weaken its cohesion. For example, Rosa demonstrated role conflict when she composite her personal life with her job. She was a self-confessor, disclosing personal feelings and issues.Simon was the opinion giver, expressing his own personal opinions as to why such project has not worked before without offering solutions. Simon can excessively be labeled a blocker. Joe was the provoker or contributor to the team. He would put up new ideas of getting the project finished by finding solutions to the problems the rest of the team members would come up with. The creation of teams has capture a key strategy in many organizations. Team building is an essential element in supporting and alter the effectiveness of small groups and task forces and must be a key part of a total program of organizational change.

No comments:

Post a Comment